NAME: Panduro Castro Eisin Wilfredo
DATE: May 15,2020
WRITING FOR ENGINEERING - CONCLUSIONS - OUTLINE
Fill in this chart with KEY INFORMATION (note form) for this section. Use one or two pieces of information per aim (depending on the aim). You will develop
more ideas in the writing activity. Also, pick up ONE key phrase/verb you will use in each section as necessary. Your rough draft must be based on this
outline. It will not be corrected if this outline is not filled and handed in. The outline MUST contain NOTES. The draft will not be graded if this
document is not completed as requested.
NOTES / KEY WORDS (if you write complete
sentences here, your draft WILL NOT BE
CORRECTED AND THE SCORE IS 0)
AIM
Revisit previous sections of report.
Aim: Anti-seismic building in Peru
Method: Fluid Viscous Dampers(FVD)
Results: Reduction 80% in 2 essential
Summarizing/ revisiting general or key results.
PHRASE TO BE USED TO
PRESENT INFORMATION.
This study developed a
It was demonstrated that
aspects. (new systems vs conventional)
Mapping (state, from your point of view what caused
the events in the project)
Comparison between new system with FVD and the
Also include causation language
conventional one.
Due to
Reduction of acceleration 90% & deflection 65%
We can say that
Seismic Dampers (FVD)
This reduction must have
Best choice for high
structures
been caused by
It means that
Achievement /contribution.
The damage is insignificant in the building
Refining the implications.
Increases evacuation time during an earthquake
Saves money on repair costs (after)
Reduce errors to improve the structural behavior
Current and future work.
Care while analyzing different buildings (Peru)
Applications.
Several Seismic Zone (Coast, Mountains & Jungle)
Limitations.
Our results are remarkable,
The purpose of
Further investigations
should
Care should be taken to
CONCLUSION
This study developed a structural anti-seismic prototype implemented by fluid viscous dampers
tested in a seismic table. It was demonstrated that, in two essential aspects analyze, there was a reduction
of 80% between the new system and a conventional one.
Due to value of acceleration and deflection produced by the building with the new system was
90% and 65% respectively lower than the value obtained by the conventional building, we can say that
the advantages are of great importance. This reduction must have been caused by the use of the seismic
dampers (FVD). It means that buildings with fluid viscous dampers are one of the best choices to
improve the structural behavior.
Our results are remarkable, because the damage in the structure is insignificant and increases
the evacuation time, which is the purpose of the engineering against this natural disasters. Also, it saves
money on repair costs.
Further investigations should be done in order to have results with less errors and improve other
aspects of the structural behavior. Furthermore, care should be taken to analyze buildings in the country,
as we have several seismic zones on the coast, mountains and jungle.
0
